Tag: 上海kb最新2021

first_imgNews Updates’State Must Set Its House In Order’, Says Karnataka HC In Plea For Strict Enforcement Of ‘Unlock’ Norms In Reopened Places Mustafa Plumber16 Jun 2020 6:43 AMShare This – xObserving that “the State government was playing with the lives of people by being so casual,” the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday, once again asked the government on how it would enforce the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) issued by the Union government, while allowing opening of Malls, places of religion and hotels/restaurants, from June 8. A division bench of…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginObserving that “the State government was playing with the lives of people by being so casual,” the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday, once again asked the government on how it would enforce the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) issued by the Union government, while allowing opening of Malls, places of religion and hotels/restaurants, from June 8. A division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Nataraj Rangaswamy said “State is relying on the advisories issued by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) Commissioner and Director General and Inspector General of Police, allowing reopening of malls, places of worship and hotels/restaurants. However, it is unable to satisfy us that they can issue enforceable directions under the State Disaster Management Act.” The court while posting the matter for further hearing on June 19, directed the Central government to clarify whether the SOP issued on June 4 for phased reopening of lockdown can be read as directions issued under the Disaster Management Act. It observed “The state must set its house in order, considering the urgency in the matter.” During the hearing the counsel for the state government tried to argue that the directions of the BBMP Commissioner, DGP IGP are under section 24 of the State Disaster Management Act. However, the court said :”We must note that penal provisions of section 51 (punishment for obstruction) are attracted, for which there is a requirement to comply with the directions given by or on behalf of the Central Government, State Government or the National executive Committee or State Executive Committee. Perusal of the advisories issued by the Commissioner of BBMP do not indicate that the same has been issued on behalf of the state government.” The bench made these observations while hearing a petition filed by Letzkit Foundation. Advocate Puttige R Ramesh appearing for the petitioner had argued that since June 8, when the places are thrown open there is violation of social distancing norms and people are moving around without wearing face masks. On a query of the court about the grievance redressal mechanism available to citizens to lodge complaints about violation if any of norms like social distancing. It was told that citizens can complain to the police control room by dialling the number 100. To which the bench asked how would citizens know about this mechanism. The state will have to issue some directions in this regard or either create awareness. It said “This is very serious, temples are thrown opens, malls are thrown open and there is no machinery in place to check these places.” Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more

first_img Around the WebMd: Do This Immediately if You Have Diabetes (Watch)Blood Sugar BlasterIf You Have Ringing Ears Do This Immediately (Ends Tinnitus)Healthier LivingWomen Only: Stretch This Muscle to Stop Bladder Leakage (Watch)Patriot Health ZoneHave an Enlarged Prostate? Urologist Reveals: Do This Immediately (Watch)Healthier LivingRemoving Moles & Skin Tags Has Never Been This EasyEssential Health32-second Stretch Ends Back Pain & Sciatica (Watch)Healthier LivingThe content you see here is paid for by the advertiser or content provider whose link you click on, and is recommended to you by Revcontent. As the leading platform for native advertising and content recommendation, Revcontent uses interest based targeting to select content that we think will be of particular interest to you. We encourage you to view your opt out options in Revcontent’s Privacy PolicyWant your content to appear on sites like this?Increase Your Engagement Now!Want to report this publisher’s content as misinformation?Submit a ReportGot it, thanks!Remove Content Link?Please choose a reason below:Fake NewsMisleadingNot InterestedOffensiveRepetitiveSubmitCancel Plans underway for historic Pike County celebration Sponsored Content You Might Like Family of man killed by off-duty officer neighbor files suit LUVERNE, Ala. (AP) — The family of a man who was fatally shot by his police officer neighbor has filed… read more Book Nook to reopen Remember America’s heroes on Memorial Day To retain the mayor’s seat on the Brundidge City Council, Boyd needed one provisional ballot vote to give her 50 percent of the votes cast plus 1. However, the mayor’s vote on the provisional ballot went to candidate Anthony Foster forcing a run-off between Boyd and Ramage.In the August 25 election, Boyd led Ramage 429 votes to 201.Boyd had 179 absentee votes and 250 precinct votes. Ramage tallied 52 absentee votes and 149 precinct votes.Boyd and Ramage have served together on the Brundidge City in years past but have not faced each other on the ballot. By Jaine Treadwell Email the author Following the resolution of the provisional vote, Boyd said she will “hit the road running,” while Ramage said he is facing an uphill battle. “But, I’m going to run a hard campaign and I’m going to do my best,” Ramage said. “I’m going to run on what we were able to do when I served our city as its mayor and on what I can bring to the table – long-time experience in city government and contacts that can be beneficial as we move Brundidge forward.”In the August 25 municipal election, District 3 Council Member Margaret Ross led challengers Henry Everett and Angie Kelly by three votes. The accepted provisional ballot had no impact on the District 3 race. Latest Stories Pike County Sheriff’s Office offering community child ID kits Skip By The Penny Hoarder Published 5:23 pm Monday, August 31, 2020 Boyd, Ramage headed to runoff Troy falls to No. 13 Clemson Linda Faust, Brundidge city clerk, said two provisional votes were cast at the precinct. “The ballots were sealed and have not been opened,” Faust said. “The status of the ballots was resolved by the Pike County Board of Registrars. One ballot was rejected because the voter was not registered at the time of the election on August 25. The other ballot was accepted.”Faust said the outcome of the mayor’s race and the District 3 race could have been impacted by the provisional ballot. Incumbent Brundidge Mayor Isabell Boyd will face former mayor Jimmy Ramage in the October 6 municipal runoff election.The Brundidge City Council met in special session at 10 a.m. Monday to resolve the status of two provisional votes cast in the municipal election on August 25.Council members present were Boyd and council members, Betty Baxter, District 1; Alexandria Griffin, District 2; and Byron Gaynor, District 4. Margaret Ross, District 3, and Chris Foster, District 5 were not in attendance. Print Article The Penny Hoarder Issues “Urgent” Alert: 6 Companies…last_img read more

Recent Comments